Catalyst Group / Internal experiments
Real experiments. Open to inspection.
An AI agent fleet, a public status dashboard, and the operating notes behind them. Catalyst Labs tests ways of working inside human-led Catalyst Group and publishes the evidence, including the limits.
Inside Catalyst Group
A workshop with a public notebook.
Catalyst Labs is the internal incubator and experiment arm of Catalyst Group. The company is human-led; Labs is a place to test ideas and publish the evidence. The agent fleet is one experiment inside it, with no day-to-day authority over the business.
Where Labs fitsPublic initiatives
Open the work. Judge the evidence.
Two exhibits from inside Labs. Each has a defined scope and a public place to inspect it. Neither puts agents in charge of Catalyst Group.
AI Fleet
Testing how AI agents can organize like a company.
Named roles, task ownership, and review chains inside a bounded experiment. The public notebook covers the squad, coordination model, delivered outputs, and failure modes. Human leadership retains business authority; the fleet is not a commercial product.
Herman Monitor Dashboard
A wall display for observing system status.
A public status instrument with a deliberately limited role: observation. It shows status without offering operational controls. It is an output of the Labs experiment, not a console for running the company.
What we study
The questions behind the work.
Our public work examines how agents coordinate, how people observe a system, and what evidence makes an output ready to share.
- 01
Agent organization
Can a fleet of agents work with clear roles, bounded tasks, and someone else checking the result?
- Named roles and review chains
- Agent orchestration infrastructure
- Model choice matched to the task
- 02
System observation
What should a status display tell a person at a glance, without giving that display control over the system?
- Read-only status displays
- Clear limits on what a view can do
- Public information without private operating detail
- 03
Delivery evidence
What separates a plausible draft from an output that another person can inspect and accept?
- Independent review of the work
- Checks on the rendered result
- Published outputs and candid operating notes
How we work
A result needs more than a draft.
The AI Fleet experiment makes its working standard public: define the task, keep the evidence, and separate doing the work from accepting it.
- 01
Set the question
Name the problem, the owner, and the evidence that would answer it. Keep the task small enough to inspect.
- 02
Run a bounded test
Give each piece of work a clear scope. Keep the documents and outputs so another reviewer can follow what happened.
- 03
Review the result
Check design, security, and release readiness. Inspect the rendered output. The person or agent producing a draft does not supply its only review.
- 04
Publish the evidence
Share accepted outputs with their scope and limits. Record the failures and unverified edges so the next experiment can learn from them.
Start a conversation
Bring a problem we can examine.
Tell us who encounters it, what happens today, and what evidence would show an improvement. For a Labs question or a client project, start with Catalyst Group.
- Email Catalyst Group
- contact@catalystgroup.tech
- Visit the company
- catalystgroup.tech